| Nom |
Comentaris |
| 375) |
 
|
| Kayla_New_York |
| h(dot)agg(dot)er(dot)s(dot)t(dot)onp(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for “technology skew” - or what ever it was….
|
| 374) |
|
| Brianna_Montana |
| h(dot)agg(dot)er(dot)s(dot)ton(dot)per(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was “only reading a WSJ article” on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.
|
| 373) |
|
| Kayla_Pennsylvania |
| h(dot)agger(dot)s(dot)to(dot)np(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" — I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you — and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.
|
| 372) |
|
| Jocelyn_Washington |
| h(dot)a(dot)gge(dot)rston(dot)p(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.
|
| 371) |
|
| Sarah_Colorado |
| h(dot)a(dot)ggerst(dot)on(dot)p(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your #@*%! the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.
|
| 370) |
|
| Addison_Oregon |
| ha(dot)gg(dot)ers(dot)t(dot)o(dot)npe(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They’ve turned “1/3 of the government” on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.
|
| 369) |
|
| Elizabeth_Georgia |
| hag(dot)g(dot)e(dot)rsto(dot)nper(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.
|
| 368) |
|
| Avery_Connecticut |
| haggers(dot)t(dot)onp(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for “technology skew” - or what ever it was….
|
| 367) |
|
| Ashley_Maryland |
| hag(dot)ge(dot)r(dot)s(dot)t(dot)onper(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :)
|
| 366) |
|
| Andrea_Utah |
| ha(dot)g(dot)gerst(dot)o(dot)n(dot)pe(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Localizacio:
Uzbekistan |
|
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :)
|